| Republican, if a child has a mortal illness and has no health care should he be left to die? Politics - 9 Answers Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions : 1 : No, the child's family should beg for donations. 2 : Do you hate facts? What "republican" EVER said that. Typical liberal logic, if the facts don't help, LIE! 3 : As long as he hasn't been aborted, they don't care ... 4 : We'll just let the libs kill it. They don't seem to mind. 5 : Oh, come on... They don't even let the Illegals or the ciminals on death row be left to die. 6 : No one is turned down for care, with or without health coverage: The last four links as Y/A won't let you "post" more than ten! 7 : See, this is what causes libs to lose all credibility. They don't know the facts. The facts are that anyone and I do mean ANYONE with a critical illness get health care. Have you ever heard of Medicaid? Also, did you know that you can walk into any emergency room and get treated on the spot with no proof of ANYTHING? Not to mention, let's go into all these households that are crying about no insurance and find out how many have state of the art cell phones, flat panel TV's, state of the art Stereo systems, and God knows what other modern electronic gadget. The problem with these whiners is that they have their priorities all screwed up. The cell phones, cars, TV's and such take priority over the well being of their children. 8 : Republican HEALTH CARE RUN UP COST AT THE E.R. ha ha hahah ah ha hahahaha 9 : Nope, Thats why Republicans started the SCHIP childrens state health insurance program Over Democratic party objections in 1997. When every Democratic member of the Hourse of representatives, Voted against giving children health insurance. Read more discussions :
|
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Republican, if a child has a mortal illness and has no health care should he be left to die
